WINSSWINSSWINSS Data_AnalysisData_Analysis
 
State View

School
Show Schools

District
None Chosen

State

Change school or district
  
How did students perform on state test at grades 3-8 and 10?
Grade: All Tested Grades •3 •4 •5 •6 •7 •8 •10 •Combined Grades
Subject: All Tested Subjects •Reading •Language Arts •Mathematics •Science •Social Studies
Level: All Levels •Advanced •Advanced + Proficient •Basic + Min Perf +No WSAS •WAA SwD •WAA ELL •No WSAS
WSAS: WKCE and WAA Combined •WKCE Only
View By: All Students •Gender •Race/Ethnicity •Grade •Disability •Economic Status •English Proficiency •Migrant Status
Compare To: Prior Years •District/State •Selected Schools •Similar Schools •Current State Data

Go to: Nov 2012** Test Results


** Due to cut score adjustments in 2002 and 2012, proficiency data are not comparable over time. WINSS reading and math proficiency data through Nov 2011 are not comparable to more recent data. WINSS proficiency data (all subjects) for Nov 2002 through Nov 2011 are not comparable to earlier years. Some subject area tests are given only at grades 4, 8, and 10.
Due to 2010-11 race/ethnicity reporting changes, pre- and post-2010-11 data by race/ethnicity may not be comparable.
FAY = full academic year. What are WSAS, WKCE, and WAA? [More]
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Economic Status
Entire State
November 2011 Data Compared to Prior Years
Summary - All School Types Combined
   Enrolled at Test TimeNo WSAS TotalMin PerfBasicProficientAdvanced
Nov. 2011Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged26,8661.3%8.1%22.4%40.1%28.1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data33,4010.3%1.9%8.8%32.8%56.2%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged26,7231.0%8.5%20.0%44.1%26.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data33,4110.3%1.9%7.6%34.3%56.0%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged26,5830.8%9.2%21.9%46.4%21.8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data34,4050.3%2.0%7.8%39.4%50.5%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged26,1340.6%8.8%16.7%46.7%27.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data35,7200.3%2.0%5.9%33.4%58.5%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged25,3150.8%8.9%14.0%45.1%31.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,1780.3%2.3%4.8%31.2%61.4%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged24,6881.0%9.8%15.9%49.0%24.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,7740.3%2.5%6.4%39.9%50.9%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged22,6991.9%15.1%20.5%32.6%29.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data42,4660.8%3.9%8.7%27.9%58.7%
Nov. 2010Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged26,6111.3%8.7%21.4%40.3%28.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data33,5080.2%2.2%8.3%31.4%57.8%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged26,6060.8%7.2%20.2%46.1%25.8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data34,4510.2%1.6%6.5%36.1%55.5%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged26,1210.6%6.5%18.7%50.1%24.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data35,3750.2%1.5%6.1%38.6%53.6%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged25,1870.7%7.7%16.0%49.1%26.5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data35,8750.2%1.7%4.5%35.5%58.1%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged24,7520.7%7.7%14.8%46.5%30.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,5990.3%1.8%4.7%33.5%59.6%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged23,7660.9%8.7%14.1%47.1%29.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data37,6540.3%2.2%4.7%34.4%58.5%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged22,7681.9%16.4%24.2%34.5%23.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data43,3910.7%4.6%11.1%32.5%51.1%
Nov. 2009Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged25,5791.1%8.8%23.5%40.3%26.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data35,0350.2%2.4%9.0%33.0%55.4%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged25,2210.7%9.0%21.1%44.1%25.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,0390.2%2.2%7.7%34.5%55.4%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged24,3450.6%9.7%22.7%46.3%20.6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,0830.2%2.4%8.2%39.9%49.2%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged23,9420.6%9.3%16.9%46.1%27.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data36,7280.2%2.2%6.0%34.6%57.1%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged22,8610.7%9.2%14.5%45.5%30.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data37,9750.2%2.2%5.0%31.7%60.9%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged22,4560.8%10.3%17.0%48.4%23.5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data39,3400.3%2.8%6.1%40.8%50.1%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged21,9792.0%18.2%21.3%31.2%27.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data45,7900.6%4.5%10.1%28.2%56.6%
Nov. 2008Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged23,1541.4%9.8%24.0%38.6%26.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data37,7750.2%2.9%9.2%31.0%56.7%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged22,6781.0%7.3%23.5%44.6%23.6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data37,6540.2%1.8%8.4%36.1%53.5%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged22,0810.8%9.3%22.5%45.2%22.1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,0970.2%2.3%8.6%40.1%48.9%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged21,3290.9%11.3%18.5%45.0%24.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,9450.2%2.5%6.3%35.6%55.4%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged20,8951.0%9.5%16.2%46.1%27.1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data40,7170.2%2.2%5.6%35.6%56.5%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged20,6671.2%11.1%16.3%47.7%23.7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data41,5710.3%2.7%5.7%38.7%52.7%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged19,7272.8%18.6%23.4%32.9%22.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data48,9750.8%5.1%11.2%32.3%50.5%
Nov. 2007Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged21,7771.9%9.1%23.4%40.4%25.1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,2190.3%2.7%9.6%32.3%55.2%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged21,6681.4%8.9%22.2%44.2%23.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,4130.4%2.1%8.2%37.2%52.1%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged20,6761.1%7.7%19.4%49.0%22.8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,9430.3%1.8%6.8%39.0%52.1%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged20,3941.1%9.6%18.3%48.2%22.7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data40,5120.3%2.1%5.3%37.7%54.6%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged20,3361.4%11.0%16.5%46.6%24.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data41,7050.3%2.4%5.7%35.6%56.0%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged20,4361.6%12.2%16.3%46.6%23.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data43,7180.4%2.9%5.6%37.5%53.7%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged18,5353.7%18.4%24.6%33.4%19.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data51,6501.1%5.0%11.7%33.2%49.1%
Nov. 2006Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged21,4752.1%8.7%21.9%41.6%25.8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,1410.3%2.3%8.9%33.6%54.8%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged20,7342.7%7.9%21.3%45.8%22.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,7160.4%2.1%8.3%37.6%51.6%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged20,5181.7%9.3%18.6%48.5%21.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data39,7880.2%2.3%6.3%38.7%52.5%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged20,6551.6%9.8%17.1%48.7%22.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data40,6600.3%2.3%5.5%37.6%54.3%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged20,7851.8%11.2%17.7%46.1%23.2%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data43,1470.2%2.4%5.7%37.2%54.5%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged20,8592.0%11.0%16.8%47.6%22.6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data44,7920.6%2.8%6.1%38.8%51.7%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged18,3934.0%20.6%22.8%32.3%20.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data53,3160.9%5.6%10.9%32.7%49.9%
Nov. 2005Grade 3Economically Disadvantaged19,9900.6%8.5%24.3%43.7%22.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data38,8530.3%2.4%9.5%36.0%51.8%
Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged20,1370.5%9.6%22.0%45.5%22.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data39,9990.2%2.5%7.7%37.6%52.0%
Grade 5Economically Disadvantaged20,1030.3%10.0%19.9%47.2%22.6%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data40,3400.1%2.7%7.7%37.5%52.0%
Grade 6Economically Disadvantaged20,5070.7%11.5%19.6%47.0%21.3%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data42,6110.2%2.6%6.6%38.4%52.2%
Grade 7Economically Disadvantaged20,4840.9%11.7%18.4%47.5%21.5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data44,8050.3%2.9%6.2%39.0%51.6%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged20,1621.2%12.2%17.0%49.7%19.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data46,8410.3%3.0%5.6%40.1%51.0%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged17,4643.3%19.5%23.0%33.2%21.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data55,4121.2%6.0%11.3%32.2%49.3%
Nov. 2004Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged19,9610.4%9.5%21.4%46.3%22.4%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data39,9060.2%2.6%8.6%37.1%51.5%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged19,4262.0%13.1%16.6%48.4%19.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data48,6350.4%2.9%5.9%41.1%49.8%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged15,9303.2%19.4%22.8%22.0%32.7%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data55,3010.8%6.4%11.9%19.3%61.5%
Nov. 2003Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged19,9570.8%8.4%20.4%45.5%24.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data41,6240.3%2.8%8.6%35.7%52.7%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged18,7611.3%18.2%19.2%47.4%13.9%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data49,6480.4%4.6%7.9%48.1%39.0%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged14,5523.8%27.5%21.7%20.1%26.8%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data55,9911.2%9.6%13.4%19.9%55.9%
Nov. 2002*Grade 4Economically Disadvantaged19,0431.0%9.0%21.0%46.0%22.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data43,3471.0%2.0%9.0%38.0%49.0%
Grade 8Economically Disadvantaged16,8462.0%14.0%18.0%47.0%18.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data50,6811.0%3.0%6.0%44.0%46.0%
Grade 10Economically Disadvantaged13,3287.0%20.0%21.0%20.0%30.0%
Not Economically Disadvantaged or No Data58,3503.0%7.0%12.0%19.0%57.0%
View comparison to annual measurable objectives

Why are data for some student groups not reported?

Download Raw Data From This Page

National Assessment of Educational Progress – Wisconsin Results

What are some questions to consider when reviewing these graphs?