WINSSWINSSWINSS Data_AnalysisData_Analysis
 
  
How did students perform on state test at grades 3-8 and 10?
Grade: All Tested Grades34567810Combined Grades
Subject: All Tested SubjectsReadingLanguage ArtsMathematicsScienceSocial Studies
Level: All LevelsAdvancedAdvanced + ProficientBasic + Min Perf +No WSASWAA SwDWAA ELLNo WSAS
WSAS: WKCE and WAA CombinedWKCE Only
View By: All StudentsGenderRace/EthnicityGradeDisabilityEconomic StatusEnglish ProficiencyMigrant Status
Compare To: Prior YearsDistrict/StateSelected SchoolsSimilar SchoolsCurrent School Data

Go to: Nov 2012** Test Results



** Due to cut score adjustments in 2002 and 2012, proficiency data are not comparable over time. WINSS reading and math proficiency data through Nov 2011 are not comparable to more recent data. WINSS proficiency data (all subjects) for Nov 2002 through Nov 2011 are not comparable to earlier years. Some subject area tests are given only at grades 4, 8, and 10.
Due to 2010-11 race/ethnicity reporting changes, pre- and post-2010-11 data by race/ethnicity may not be comparable.
FAY = full academic year. What are WSAS, WKCE, and WAA? [More]
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Gender
Pigeon River El FAY
November 2011 Data Compared to Prior Years
   Enrolled at Test TimeNo WSAS TotalMin PerfBasicProficientAdvanced
Nov. 2011Grade 3Female200.0%5.0%15.0%45.0%35.0%
Male350.0%2.9%11.4%34.3%51.4%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female320.0%0.0%9.4%40.6%50.0%
Male300.0%3.3%10.0%50.0%36.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female260.0%3.8%15.4%30.8%50.0%
Male240.0%4.2%16.7%37.5%41.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2010Grade 3Female330.0%0.0%0.0%45.5%54.5%
Male320.0%0.0%12.5%53.1%34.4%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female293.4%0.0%10.3%37.9%48.3%
Male270.0%14.8%7.4%37.0%40.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female360.0%0.0%11.1%50.0%38.9%
Male270.0%0.0%18.5%40.7%40.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2009Grade 3Female273.7%3.7%14.8%40.7%37.0%
Male260.0%3.8%26.9%38.5%30.8%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female330.0%0.0%6.1%48.5%45.5%
Male300.0%0.0%6.7%40.0%53.3%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female380.0%2.6%21.1%39.5%36.8%
Male370.0%0.0%16.2%54.1%29.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2008Grade 3Female290.0%0.0%6.9%44.8%48.3%
Male290.0%0.0%10.3%41.4%48.3%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female400.0%0.0%15.0%57.5%27.5%
Male390.0%0.0%7.7%53.8%38.5%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female320.0%3.1%18.8%40.6%37.5%
Male293.4%3.4%10.3%65.5%17.2%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2007Grade 3Female380.0%0.0%13.2%34.2%52.6%
Male392.6%0.0%5.1%48.7%43.6%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female310.0%3.2%9.7%51.6%35.5%
Male290.0%6.9%6.9%72.4%13.8%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female352.9%2.9%5.7%54.3%34.3%
Male260.0%3.8%15.4%34.6%46.2%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2006Grade 3Female310.0%0.0%22.6%29.0%48.4%
Male280.0%3.6%10.7%60.7%25.0%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female310.0%3.2%9.7%38.7%48.4%
Male313.2%3.2%9.7%45.2%38.7%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female430.0%2.3%4.7%27.9%65.1%
Male320.0%0.0%9.4%40.6%50.0%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2005Grade 3Female320.0%0.0%3.1%43.8%53.1%
Male310.0%3.2%19.4%41.9%35.5%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 4Female400.0%2.5%5.0%25.0%67.5%
Male320.0%0.0%3.1%40.6%56.3%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Grade 5Female330.0%3.0%18.2%24.2%54.5%
Male350.0%0.0%0.0%48.6%51.4%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2004Grade 4Female310.0%0.0%9.7%41.9%48.4%
Male350.0%0.0%2.9%57.1%40.0%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2003Female300.0%3.3%3.3%50.0%43.3%
Male360.0%2.8%5.6%52.8%38.9%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *
Nov. 2002*Female350.0%3.0%9.0%31.0%57.0%
Male270.0%7.0%4.0%44.0%44.0%
Gender Code Missing/Invalid0NA * * * *

Why are data for some student groups not reported?

Download Raw Data From This Page